why Rome 2? honestly i think they messed up on making a shogun 2. and napolian total war was just a waste it should have been an expatiation to empire. they should really look in to creating a game for the 1900s and on. have a lil world war one then two. then so on and have the whole world japan and china included
Total War and automatic/semi automatic rifles? No thank you, you on the other hand should go play Hearts of Iron III...
why Rome 2? honestly i think they messed up on making a shogun 2. and napolian total war was just a waste it should have been an expatiation to empire. they should really look in to creating a game for the 1900s and on. have a lil world war one then two. then so on and have the whole world japan and china included
Total War and automatic/semi automatic rifles? No thank you, you on the other hand should go play Hearts of Iron III...
Agreed. Theres enough WW1&2 games. Id rather have total war to stick to the past. Ofcourse if they keep in an endless circle here its bound to get dull eventually but right now I wouldnt mind a Rome 2. And in due time with, improved evrything, medieval 3.