Section 8 Message Board  

Al I'm saying is instead of building upon something that worked,maybe tweak it here and there, they toss it aside. Like I said in before. Earthsiege (some of u may have heard of it, it was suppose to be a Mechwarrior contender)Had it so no single mission ever played the same twice, which was a surprise, cause one mission I started out and broke left around a mountain only to be ambushed, so I was like cool, next time I went right, not only did I get ambushed again but he had help this time, did it again next time nobody at all, come to find out they were waitng for me close to the objective. I played that one op ten times and it played ten different ways. Take that build upon it CoH four Germans in the bunker next time maybe no Germans in the bunker but their waitng for you to come out the other side, next time maybe a german just outside the bunker and tosses in a hand grenade. I think a little code like that adds vast amount of replayability. And it shows developers are working taking advantage of the technology. I rather for a game to be pushed back a month or two and give me a better product than have to wait for a series of patches. I think a patch/update shouldn't be to fix a bug, but something a developer read on the games site forum and said man thats cool why didnt we think of that let's add it in a patch.