Command & Conquer: Red Alert 3 Message Board  

Ever heard of artistic value? Imagination? Creativity?

I mean seriously... the Empire of the Rising Sun's Hero unit is a levitating, telekinesis-wielding, school girl... Did you expect her to be rendered in Hi-Def? What about the blood thirsty armored Soviet circus Bears? Did you expect the bear to be realistic and super detailed?

It's a game... just a game... when I sit down in front of a GAME, I want to have fun, I want to be immersed in an unreal world.

That's what is wrong with the gaming world today, we want games that are visually stunning but no depth, just reproduced and unoriginal garbage.

i believe RA2 is better...

RA3 didnt really show what happened after RA2...

their storyline is kinda lazy work...

it's very confusing what happened at RA3 and how it really turned out like that...

at RA3,they removed einstein,then who built chronosphere?

it also means that the allies would have not been able to beat the soviets because they dont have the technology to do so,it's einsteins technolgical works that really helped the allies beat the soviets at RA1 and RA2...

so,removing einstein means that the soviets would have been victorious at WW2...

so the story in RA3 didnt really back uped the game...

but EA did their best on the units and the game itself...

so,it's just plain play the game online or on LAN against other players or just play by yourself at skirmish and have fun...

that is what i believe the effect of RA3...

I have not said i want my games at HD quality just not a cartoon. i also said that the game was too easy not that it lacked creativity imagination or artistic value i just wanted more from the game and didnt get it. Yes i want i want a game to be visually staunner and yes i want depth in my game it not asking for much surely. I dont care what a game cost me if its a great game. If RA3 came out looking like C&C3 and played just a little bit harder i would of willing paid more for it because i know im getting my money's worth. I also think your getting some of the things ive said wrong i do like the game im always playing it i just wanted more from the game thats all. With RA2 im still playing it online with my mates i know the game well and when ive played RA3 for that long i will probably love it as much as i do RA2.

I have no complants about the units i think the bullfrog is great it would of been great in RA2. The bears for example are better than the dogs.Im not too sure about the tesla boats though being able to go on land. The hero units are a lot better than previous version of the game although i did like the russian one hows name for now escapes me but natasha has filled the roll well and has anyone else noticed all the hero units in this game are female.

My original post seems to be doning what i want so keep your posts coming argue with me point out the good points of RA3 tell me what you really thing of the game where you think they could of improved on it and more importantly where you thing they got it right.

dear god people let it go already, there are enough of these discussion all over the net already

Agreed. I get tired of it. There's 3 threads let alone on this subject, on CHU alone. Let it go. Go play something else.

But still... no RA is better than RA 2 or RA 1 !
This game FAILED to live up to its predecessor as the story & unit design is so... bland & unrealistic to comes in a fantasy war too
Plus... just a 3 faction ? bah... looks like another EA efforts to milking their money by creating another exp that add FACTION MODE eh ?
Typical !

I totaly agree with the last post i also think this discussion has run as far as its going to and if i knew how to close it i would.