luck rulz but the bugs ppl are talking about is actually a crappy optimization
u may not notice it if u have a strong rig, tho
and minor gfx artifacts on ATi cards and on vista
i sincerely hope they'll improve everything. but as far as ive read form the reviews its the same collection of advantages and disatvantages that the original stalker was. but i think ill still try out their new ecosystem and gfx effects. ïîïûòêà íå ïûòêà êðîìå êàê $ óáûâàþò
My PC is not HiEnd, but not crappy too ))
amd x2 6000+, 4Gb RAM, RAID 0 2x500Gb Seagate Barracuda 16 Mb, 8800 GT 512 Mb. Win XP HE. The game runs smoothly.
Áîëüøå è íå íóæíî íà äàííûé ìîìåíò ñåé÷àñ.
not crappy at all, its a steady midend if u ask me, i got 2 gigs of ram and a 8600 now THATS crap.
as for the game well i understand u dont have problems u got an xp and an nvidia card...
can u plz tell me is it really more demandful to hardware? i mean i could play shadow of chernobyl in high resolution only on medium settings, will i need to kick down the res on clear sky?
[Edited by pop33, 8/26/2008 1:38:45 PM]
â îáùåì, íàïèøó ïî-ðóññêè. íàäåþñü, äÿäüêè àäìèíû ðóãàòüñÿ íå áóäóò. òîðìîçà íà âûñîêèõ ðàçðåøåíèÿõ ïðîèñõîäÿò èç-çà íåäîñòàòî÷íîãî êîë-âà ïàìÿòè íà áîðòó ó âèäþõè. òàê, äëÿ êîððåêòíîé ðàáîòû èãð â ðàçðåøåíèè 1280*1024 è âûøå ñ âêëþ÷åííûì àíòèàëàéçèíãîì, íóæíî íå ìåíåå 512 Ìá âèäåî ïàìÿòè.
in a few words - english version. for a smooth run u need at least 512 mb of video memory at high resolutions when anti alising is "on"
[Edited by kotoffsky, 8/27/2008 11:32:44 AM]
47 ñòðàíèö? áàãîâ? jeez, i guess i really have to wait for the english version and a dozen patches :|
damn it, guys. I see no bugs AT ALL!
not crappy at all, its a steady midend if u ask me, i got 2 gigs of ram and a 8600 now THATS crap.
as for the game well i understand u dont have problems u got an xp and an nvidia card...
can u plz tell me is it really more demandful to hardware? i mean i could play shadow of chernobyl in high resolution only on medium settings, will i need to kick down the res on clear sky?
[Edited by pop33, 8/26/2008 1:38:45 PM]
â îáùåì, íàïèøó ïî-ðóññêè. íàäåþñü, äÿäüêè àäìèíû ðóãàòüñÿ íå áóäóò. òîðìîçà íà âûñîêèõ ðàçðåøåíèÿõ ïðîèñõîäÿò èç-çà íåäîñòàòî÷íîãî êîë-âà ïàìÿòè íà áîðòó ó âèäþõè. òàê, äëÿ êîððåêòíîé ðàáîòû èãð â ðàçðåøåíèè 1280*1024 è âûøå ñ âêëþ÷åííûì àíòèàëàéçèíãîì, íóæíî íå ìåíåå 512 Ìá âèäåî ïàìÿòè.
in a few words - english version. for a smooth run u need at least 512 mb of video memory at high resolutions when anti alising is "on"
[Edited by kotoffsky, 8/27/2008 11:32:44 AM]
ó ìíÿ 512 âèäåî ÍÎ âñå òàêè ýòî 8600 à íå õàéåíä êàêîé-òî, ÿ âîîáøå âûøå 1024 768 è íå ñìåþ ñòàâèòü. à àëèàçèíã - ìå÷òàòü íå âðåäíî...
ïðî áàãîâ îõîòíî âåðþ, äîæäóñü ENG âåðñèè è îáÿçàòåëüíî êóïëþ
and anyway i think this bug discussion is pointless. we'll all need to try the game ourselves. the bugs seem minor cuz there you go, some ppl dont even have them.