We currently don't have any Pulp Fiction: Collector´s Edition trainers, cheats or editors for PC. Premium members may REQUEST new trainers and cheats using our request system as long as the game has not been permanently retired or multiplayer only in nature. Use our message board to discuss the game.
malyg posted on Jul 30, 2008 10:17:36 AM - Report post
I object!
Not really
big up all da people from the westside crew hate the eastside crew
INACTIVE
SuperSaiyan4 posted on Jul 30, 2008 11:21:58 AM - Report post
wait, so you're going to skip day five?
ELITE
Elite posted on Jul 30, 2008 12:45:07 PM - Report post
No obviously O_o.
Elite He's been here for so long yet he's only made himself known once with Eliteitude...after that...not much else.
Posted by Neo 19/1/10
#Voted favourite mod 2011
Founder of Cow
/--\
INACTIVE
Yoshi posted on Jul 30, 2008 1:15:19 PM - Report post
I'd like to give a big thanks to drpepper for running this pretty much single-handedly for awhile.
I'm going to be honest right now; I am seriously not finding any time to run this. Being an honor student entering his sophomore year, I REALLY have to try hard in order to get into the colleges I want to. I have a few summer projects that, well...I've been taking a lot of time to over-do. ^_^
And well, with drpepper's help, I've found it a lot less stressful. Originally I had asked 5 users to assist me in this project, and eventually it came down to 3 users; Latios, Chingy, and drpepper. But Chingy had other things to do and resigned, and Latios, well...just stopped all of a sudden. All my gratitude and respects for drpepper here.
When I've completed my projects, I plan to open up the new website. It's about 75% completed, so...patience. ^_^
V.I.P.
drpepperfanatic posted on Jul 30, 2008 4:18:12 PM - Report post
Why thanks, Ryan.
Yeah I felt pretty alone for a while and seeing as how I don't have excel makes things a lot more difficult and time-consuming. Thanks for fixing standings tho although I thought I had done that. Some of them don't really make sense but if that's how it goes I won't interfere.
****** ****** ****** ****** ********** (,)(,)
*......*
INACTIVE
Yoshi posted on Jul 30, 2008 5:57:47 PM - Report post
Doesn't make sense? Allow me to try and make it make sense.
Alright, someone (Al-pucino, for example) goes just does a so-so job on CHU. He's moderately well-liked, therefore he gets a moderate score of 7-7-1 and a total vote of 59. Another guy (dstates, also an example) does his best to be a great guy on CHU. He's very well-liked, and gets a score of 10-3-2, and yet only has a total vote of 57. Wouldn't you think it'd seem fair to put the guy who actually went through the effort to win the majority of matches first, rather than the user who's only won half?
Makes sense to me. ^_^
V.I.P.
drpepperfanatic posted on Jul 30, 2008 6:08:16 PM - Report post
No I understand that. It's just difficult to see how that all fits since it's so early with standings. I don't know.
****** ****** ****** ****** ********** (,)(,)
*......*
INACTIVE
Yoshi posted on Jul 30, 2008 6:16:13 PM - Report post
The standings change up very quickly. No matter what, it'll always end with the same outcome. So even if someone looks like they're dominating because they've won 5 times in a row, it could've been the 5 weakest users in the division.