You have XBL?
If so my GT is in my signature.
I think you got off topic there and kind of should get back on topic before ''they'' give us a warning. Ok like I was saying The graphica are supposed to be good on Halo 3 and that's what everyone's talking about.
Nope. But I can see that you have never read the four novels that expanded the Haloverse.
And I can see that you are comparing Halo 2...to games on the Xbox 360. Halo 2 came out in 04, just wait until Halo 3 comes out.
And with live play, it depends on your connection strength. 95% of the time, I have a lag-free, bug-free match for Halo 2.
Well mate i also didnt watch the Stalker film before playing the game, nor did i read stalker comic books or any novels, but i still had a blast.
Actually you gave a perfect example of what im talking about, why would a game rate as a "legend", "fantastic", etc need a series of novels, a tv show, preferably a half a dozen films and a trading card game ( speaking metaphorically ofcourse ) to be elevated from any generic FPS with some "gimmick"?
Why? Because it by itself is simply lacking the means to justify that rating.
Just ask yourself this, would Halo be nearly as successful without "Mr" Bill Gates?
And about my connection, its a DSL 1mb, and it can easily support WoW, F.E.A.R. and Battlefield online, so i realy dont see why would be any trouble here..
PS Why do you presume that i meant other x-box games?
"I can see that you are comparing Halo 2...to games on the Xbox 360"
It is absolutely self evident that PS console series is far superior to X-box in almost every tehnical way (even the price), and counting the fact that Sony doesnt have Microsoft behind them (and its resources)...
By the way if i cant compare halo 1/2 to equivalent games (same year), by what right can you compare halo3 to those games?
[Edited by redlined, 6/30/2007 3:22:34 AM]