@PWizard I understand and accept that converting old trainers to Aurora is your highest priority, and how crucial that is for Aurora's success, though I'm not sure how aware you are about how many of us are still playing (and will keep on playing for the foreseeable future) older game, which their trainers would probably never get converted.
That being said, is there a chance of at least adding a "soft by last used", or "mark as favorite" options to the standalone trainers tab?
@eltoro200 -- Thanks for your understanding. And believe it or not, our goal is to convert the latest version of EVERY single trainer for every single game in our database over to Aurora so that all games and users should be converted over. It's just taking a great deal of time.
Hopefully 0x90 will be able to implement your compromise option(s) into a future update.
@PWizard thanks, that's actually really reassuring for the long run that there won't be clutter in the standalone trainers list.
And thanks @0x90 for the effort to implement the favorites option.
What about trainers that Aurora is not able to identify and add to the standalone list even when extracted to the right folder (ie. S.T.A.L.K.E.R Shadow of Chernobyl)?
Unfortunately there are some trainers that are using like 6 templates ago that don't have the information attached to them that both the Trainer Manage and Aurora need to identify the game, etc. Unlikely those will ever be updated to Aurora because they are quite older. Sorry.
"Standalone trainers are about to retire. We do support to launch them within Aurora for your convenience but over the time they will become less and less and it simply don't make any sense to put much work into something that is about to retire."
OP,
This is their way of saying that they can cater to popular and current mega release games and not have to deal with thousands of old games. It's less work for CH, and gamers are willing to pay to keep a handful of trainers updated for the current popular games. It's just smart business on their part.
@eltoro200, I hate to see CH shifting that direction also. I would suggest checking the web for possible other trainers if you play older games.
[Edited by JDSWingnut, 4/24/2022 12:19:38 PM]
This does not mean anything of the sort, we're actually working DOUBLE TIME to convert the most recent version of EVERY TRAINER IN OUR DATABASE (that's possible) to Aurora, so please get your facts straight before you start recommending to send people to other sites. Now, if that is your wish, then I will be happy to deactivate your account, refund your LIFETIME membership of 10 YEARS (when you paid like what, $39?) and you can be on your way. But best of luck trying to find one of those "other sites" that even has the BALLS to sell a LIFETIME membership. Otherwise, we will get back to work making the SAME AMOUNT OF TRAINERS for both NEW and OLD games that we always have PLUS moving all those OLD trainers over to Aurora.
...it's ungrateful people like this that just PISS ME OFF. Like we haven't provided enough content in 10 years to be worth his whole $39 that now he recommends other sites. Give me a break. We should have done like all of our competitors and never even offered a LIFETIME membership. We'd definitely be much better off financially, that's for damn sure, because that is all our competition cares about while we are over here giving away hoodies, $20 gift cards, backpacks and free games EVERY DAY TO OUR MEMBERS, oh, and about $40K worth of stuff every Christmas while they do NOTHING but gobble up money every year from their members until eternity.
Yeh, so go find a better site that does more for their members and puts out more content every month, I DARE YOU.
C ****ING H.
I have no quarrel with CH. I don't feel that CH is ****ting on me. Yeah, there are some issues, but which app/service doesn't have them? including legacy code to carry and its limitations.
The bottom line is that CH is a business and it needs to justify its existence, and that is perfectly logical for me.
Having said that, I do wish that Lifetime of Lifetime Plus would have been better priced, but that's outside the topic of this thread.
Well it is currently on sale for 30% OFF if that makes any difference. Also, people thought that our LIFETIME membership had been better priced at $39 about 11 years ago too. You see how that turned out.
Important Board Topics
Trending Topics