Yes, the financial world is a huge monopoly where the harshest win, the ISPs are only a small part of the package deal, everyone devour their neighbor for dough, the phony part is: we all suffer from a minimal amount of vultures. But then, most are conveyed to follow the riches - while we all know the futility of the matter - going fast forward nowhere, picking to extinction just to keep the markets flowing, to subjugate the fraud while the servile flourish the businesses, being exploited by our elected benefactors speaking tongues repeatedly with charisma and often armed to the teeth...But no one want to hear it, until those that pollute this earth realize that life on orbital stations isn't that much attractive....as fiscal paradises do not protect from famine..|
Did I go too far?....no not again...don't worry, you're safe...you're crazy 💣
I'm in a desperate need to play a game where I can get rid of all the bad dummies with no casualties, thanks to the help of CHEAT HAPPENS I can do it
So who, and or where, is the answer to the dilemma you have described? If millions of people are affected by inexorable and unyielding forces, should we turn to a single bureaucrat, or a group of bureaucrats and let them decide our fate? We must not allow ourselves to forget that bureaucrats must earn a living, and that they earn their living from the productive members of society - in truth they produce nothing.
It has been evident to me, that bureaucratic (statist) intervention in private matters; always leads to a "one size fits all" solution. This solution ironically, almost always fits very few. In addition, their solutions also create what I term; "insoluble conflicts" or unintended consequences. With these things in mind, we must accept the fact that the bureaucrat is like every other person, and has his own selfish self interests at heart - they want to preserve and protect their own livelihood.
Because these things are what they are, I much rather prefer "market forces" as a reliable guide. Rather than the "tail wagging the dog"; which is what happens when the few tell the many what they should or should not do; I rely on what the many have said, done, and are doing - this is an essential element of what I call, the wisdom of the free market.