For them to look accurate on the Inside they would need permission to reproduce it in the game.
Whether it be pictures, or the Devs actually going there.
[Edited by DigitalIP, 12/4/2011 8:59:03 AM]
Not really, they could have made them look like "Anything" as long as its remotely close to the original most of the people wouldnt care .. i think time limitation is what caused them to completly ignore this part of the game ..
There's a reason I didn't buy this game. Sure, you can say there's 'new ****', but most of it is the expected mechanics upgrade like hook zipline and what not, there's always LITTLE mechanics upgrades.
In terms of story content? It's way too short a game. They try to pad out the length by deliberate MMO style time wasting elements. The whole LETS PLAY TOWAR DEFANSE! crap is nothing but a deliberate timewaster. Likewise with the medeterranian defense crap requiring time to just PASS... Reminds me of some MMO's where in order to craft something, you have to AFK and let time pass... oh wait, that's called content right? Pfft.
Not impressed with this AC... Sure, what story content there is in the game IS GOOD, lets be fair, the story content that exists is very good... but the entire game is not worth full price. Obviously this should have been the '2nd half of Brotherhood'... Brotherhood and this should have been sold together as one game... but... meh, typical of any big game that gets successful, they cut it into bits to sell and milk as much cash as possible.
Here's hoping AC3 will be a 'full' AC game again. But like with this game, I won't be buying it until I'm sure it's a full game.
That is the problem with a yearly release schedule. They can't add as much as they want into it. Plus, doing multiplayer also limits what they can add to it if they have to split up the development team. I would rather they have a development time of two or three years and not work on the multiplayer till after the game is already out.
Important Board Topics
Trending Topics