what you think the game is bad because of the guns?
No... I believe the game is bad (read: not worth the $60) for many other reasons.
I think that it is a shame that a FPS, based in the past, would have so many historically inaccurate weapons.
Lets face it; when CoD first came on the scene, it was nice to see a game that was, from a historical point of view, accurate with the weapons it presented to the user .
[
[Edited by Sthamper, 11/14/2010 6:30:59 PM]
They stretch the history. Going with the idea that just because a gun was released to the open market in the 70's doesn't mean its prototypes where not available for field testing before that date.
I'd be more concerned with Sympathy for the Devil being in the game on the level Crash Site when it wasn't released until December 6, 1968, several months after the mission's date.
touché