Our Call of Duty: Black Ops Trainer is now available and supports STEAM.
Our Call of Duty: Black Ops message board is available to provide feedback on our trainers or cheats.
Sthamper posted on Nov 14, 2010 8:52:36 AM - Report post
With the fantastic work that InfinityWard put into MW I&II, wht would it be acceptable for Treyarch to have so many anachronisms in a game?
---> AK-74 in "the-sixties" ??? ---> H&K G-11 in "the-sixties" ??? ---> FAMAS in "the-sixties" ??? ---> AUG in "the-sixties" ???
I'm sure there is more, given the minimal amount of work done by "Treyarse's" research team .
Why did they find this acceptable ?
I for one will never buy another "Call of Duty" title unless InfinityWard is involved.
INACTIVE
JakeChase posted on Nov 14, 2010 10:17:07 AM - Report post
what you think the game is bad because of the guns?
INACTIVE
miyakei posted on Nov 14, 2010 11:12:01 AM - Report post
Well for historical accuracy for the type of game... yes
INACTIVE
ArchDuke posted on Nov 14, 2010 11:47:11 AM - Report post
Well that AK officially began being used in the seventies, if you take the whole "Just because they write it down and call it history doesn't make true" thing seriously, the weapon could have been available then.
...I don't know about the others
INACTIVE
jonashakon posted on Nov 14, 2010 12:15:37 PM - Report post
are you shur it a AK-74 and not a AK-47?? seing as the AK-47 is from 1949
ELDER
EvilSodaPop posted on Nov 14, 2010 12:17:13 PM - Report post
They were all developed in the early 70's.
ELDER
EvilSodaPop posted on Nov 14, 2010 12:17:40 PM - Report post
@jonashakon they have the ak47 but also the ak74u
[Edited by EvilSodaPop, 11/14/2010 12:19:11 PM]
INACTIVE
jonashakon posted on Nov 14, 2010 12:28:23 PM - Report post
ok it's just easy to get them mixt up especially in a game because they look very similar