In my opinion they didn't change much from Modern Warfare to Modern Warfare 2. Maybe a few weapons and some of the missions, as far as graphics its the same to me. Where if you compare Battlefield 2, Battlefield 2142, and the new coming Battlefield Bad Company 2 you can see many changes between the games, and even improvements too. I like the fact that you can Mod Battlefield 2, i don't know about Battlefield 2142 as i did not like the fact that it has alien "made up" weapons, i like real life weapons, battles, tactics.
Like i said before i just wanted to hear other peoples opinions about the game.
Here is a Link about the game play of Battlefield Bad Company 2. It looks far better to me then Modern Warfare 2. I am gonna be happy to spend $50 for that game where i was disappointed about buying Modern Warfare 2.
same here maybe there will be less wall hackers as well and rankhackers
In my opinion i think MW2 is far better than BF:BD2 but then again i own the game MW2 and only played the demo for Bad Company but i like MW2 because i think there's a HUGE difference in the graphics in MW1 and MW2. Thoughts?
In my opinion of playing both games, Id say bfbc2is far better in multiplayer and single. first there is way less hackers playing since punkbuster is almost mandatory to play online, and the single player mode seemed longer, codmw2 was cut to short, and way to many hackers even though leveling up is easier, but this is only my opinion.
lol punkbuster sucks. It kicks normal players more than hackers. UAC2 is the way to go.
Important Board Topics
Trending Topics