General Discussions

Page 2 of 4   •  First Page  •  Previous Page  •   Next Page  •   Last Page
Signup or Login to Post
achievements: do we really care?
  • Current rank: 2.5 Stars. Next Rank at 2000 Posts.
    Send a message to Skyheart
    ELDER
    Skyheart posted on Sep 18, 2011 3:59:58 AM - Report post
     
    Achievements have always been in games in one form or another, whether it's getting bonuses for killing sprees, doing a certain thing a certain way, or unlocking bonus levels, etc. Achievements in their current form are just the latest incarnation.

    "Remember the good old days when you could just slap Omni-Gel on everything?" - Shepard, ME2

    "Not right now. Trying to determine how Scale Itch got aboard. Sexually transmitted disease carried only by Varren..... Implications unpleasant." - Mordin, ME2
  • Current rank: 4.5 Stars. Next Rank at 20.000 Posts.
    Send a message to Shibby
    ELITE
    Shibby posted on Sep 18, 2011 4:35:05 AM - Report post
     
    Waste of time that could have been spent by the developers fixing one of the dozens of bugs that appear in nearly every new release.
    Shibby __/--

  • Send a message to Rami
    INACTIVE
    Rami posted on Sep 18, 2011 6:57:00 AM - Report post
     
    quote:
    originally posted by Shibby

    Waste of time that could have been spent by the developers fixing one of the dozens of bugs that appear in nearly every new release.

    Actually I don't think they waste that much time on them, at least not as much as we do.

    Well when it comes to Achievements or Trophies it kinda depends on how much I like the game, so when I finish the game if I feel like I need some extra challenge I try to get as much trophies as I can until I'm sick of the game.
    For example FF XIII's Treasure Hunter's trophy took me forever to get it, but I didn't stop not because I wanted to brag with my friends or anything, just because it was a challenge for me in a game I enjoy playing.
    However there are some trophies which can be really meaningless or just needs too much time to do.
    So far I've only had 3 Platinum Trophies, but in general I'd be disappointed when I buy a game that doesn't have trophies.

     
  • Current rank: 2.5 Stars. Next Rank at 2000 Posts.
    Send a message to Skyheart
    ELDER
    Skyheart posted on Sep 18, 2011 8:39:52 AM - Report post
     
    quote:
    originally posted by Rami

    quote:
    originally posted by Shibby

    Waste of time that could have been spent by the developers fixing one of the dozens of bugs that appear in nearly every new release.

    Actually I don't think they waste that much time on them, at least not as much as we do.

    Well when it comes to Achievements or Trophies it kinda depends on how much I like the game, so when I finish the game if I feel like I need some extra challenge I try to get as much trophies as I can until I'm sick of the game.
    For example FF XIII's Treasure Hunter's trophy took me forever to get it, but I didn't stop not because I wanted to brag with my friends or anything, just because it was a challenge for me in a game I enjoy playing.
    However there are some trophies which can be really meaningless or just needs too much time to do.
    So far I've only had 3 Platinum Trophies, but in general I'd be disappointed when I buy a game that doesn't have trophies.

    This.

    I think for a lot of people, achievements can actually help to extend gameplay. Ramis' Treasure Hunter example is perfect.

    Another good example is Deus Ex: Human Revolutions' Pacifist and Foxiest achievement, which you get for completing the game without killing a single person and without setting off any alarms respectively.

    I admit I usually don't care much for achievements - I don't not like them, I just can't be bothered usually - but for Pacifist I specifically completed the game using a different tactic than usual (I usually hate stealth games and go in to every area guns blazing). By working for the Pacifist achievement I found I truly enjoyed the game in a new way which I'd never have done without the achievement available.

    As for fixing bugs instead, a development team is (usually) made up of a large number of people, with one team dedicated to one thing, another team to another, etc. In other words, there are people working specifically on fixing bugs, and it proabably wouldn't make a difference if one more person were assigned to that team rather than coming up with achievements.

    "Remember the good old days when you could just slap Omni-Gel on everything?" - Shepard, ME2

    "Not right now. Trying to determine how Scale Itch got aboard. Sexually transmitted disease carried only by Varren..... Implications unpleasant." - Mordin, ME2
  • Current rank: 2 Stars. Next Rank at 1000 Posts.
    Send a message to infinite_gamer
    ELITE
    infinite_gamer posted on Sep 18, 2011 10:35:16 AM - Report post
     
    I'm old school.I don't care about acheivments or trophies in games.I remember(41) back in the day when you could use gameshark or pelican to cheat on the PS2.But,that is another story altogether.
  • Current rank: 3 Stars. Next Rank at 4000 Posts.
    Send a message to benduhova
    HIM
    benduhova posted on Sep 18, 2011 12:41:50 PM - Report post
     
    i dont think it is the type of people who want acheivments its the sort of games they play that need them to encourage replay take me2 for example with such a dynamic story and multiple story pathways the replay value is great i played 3 times over a different way each time before i even noticed it had built in acheivments because it didnt need them to make you play again
    now take spacemarine with linear sp and no replay value unless you are trying to get the 50 acheivments which mostly consist of playing linear sp again but swinging a different weapon woopwoop
    ~ CH PROMO CLUB ~
    Cheating games not gamers
  • Tier 7
    Send a message to QueenNic
    TIER 7
    QueenNic posted on Sep 18, 2011 2:49:20 PM - Report post
     
    Achievements exist mostly for bragging rights, and within gaming this is nothing new. They're basically "Do this thing and we give you a medal". At best, it exists as proof that you'd done something. At worst it turns into immature little boys arguing because one has a higher Gamerscore and thus must be more skilled.

    However, the concept has existed for a long time. It's existed in the age old high scores and wanting your name at the top. It was also evident, for example, with all the extra stuff in Final Fantasy X. You can complete the game without fighting dark aeons and gaining celestial weapons, yet people do it anyway. Why? Because it gives them some bonus challenges to complete and then they get to brag about it.

    All that's changed is that the games give you a little gold star for doing certain things, and offer extra ones for doing ridiculously hard or stupid feats.
    Child of Neo7
    Half-sister of AdmiralThrawn
    Mother of Planbskater, Foxxie-kun, DayDreamer85, Rise_Against and FireflyPoi
    C.o.W
  • Current rank: 2.5 Stars. Next Rank at 2000 Posts.
    Send a message to Dhampy
    ELITE
    Dhampy posted on Sep 18, 2011 5:01:58 PM - Report post
     
    I find achievements often to be putting lipstick on a pig, so to speak. Always worthless and usually it seems that developers include them to try to take attention away from their crappy game.
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, 'Make us your slaves, but feed us.'

    List of CHU'ers on deviantART--SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL DEVIANTS!

    /--\
    [SG]
Page 2 of 4   •  First Page  •  Previous Page  •   Next Page  •   Last Page
Signup or Login to Post
All times are (GMT -06:00) Central Time (US & Canada). Current time is 3:25:45 AM