General Discussions

I'm certainly not going to be getting modern warfare 3 just because i'm poor and its probably just going to be the same as the last 4 or so games just with a new coat of paint.

I would get BF3 but i'm sure as hell not getting it from origins and too lazy to go out and get a hard copy I'm probably not going to get that either.

Out of which one i think will be better, probably BF3 but i reckon its going to go the same way as the call of duty series.

I think Battlefield 3 will be the overall better game. The battlefield series has always been better than the CoD series in my book. The multiplayer on Bad Company 1, and 2 are way better then CoD's multiplayer for multiple reasons. In Battlefield, the multiplayer is more squad, and tactics based, where CoD's multiplayer is more lone wolf, run-and-gun. I would much rather be put in a squad of friends and use tactics then run around shooting all over the place.

I didn't the BF3 vs MW3 disease had made it's way here and infected our message boards, but what can you do.

yup Nuff said

Just MW3!

Well you can't find a better fight against gamers when you put Battlefield and Call of Duty games in comparision.

For me, I am a single player gamer. I really don't play online except for games like Counter Strike/Left 4 Dead. Hence I chose MW3, because they always had a better single player campaign than Battlefield. But if I was more into multiplayer - I would've chosen BF3 - Which is going to be much, much better than MW3 when multiplayer is concerned

Battlefield 3 features both Single player and Co-op campaign. How is that less than MW3's offer?

I actually just Pre-ordered Battlefield 3 today. And is the Co-op campaign split-screen? This is the first time I have heard of it.