Enough guys, I wrote the same damn equation on my scientific calculator (that I trust way more than myself) and the answer was 2.
If you all come up to me and write this thing in different ways, and write numbers that I don't know about and %s and etc, it's still 2 to me, and I'm not gonna change that.
My TI-89 returns an answer of 288. Using machines is pointless. In fact C# gave the most accurate answer (which was a compile error: "2 is a constant but is used as a method" ).