General Discussions

Page 1 of 2   •  First Page  •  Previous Page  •   Next Page  •   Last Page
Signup or Login to Post
SW in 3D
  • Current rank: 2.5 Stars. Next Rank at 2000 Posts.
    Send a message to shianova
    ELITE
    shianova posted on Sep 30, 2010 6:51:11 AM - Report post
     
    Link

    This feels wrong, 3D is really over used and doesn't always gives the expected effect.
    Because French Is Awesome.

    (\__/) (\_(\(\(\
    (='.'=)(=':' )(-_-)
    (')_(')(,(')(')(_(")(")

  • Current rank: 3.5 Stars. Next Rank at 8000 Posts.
    Send a message to yosup
    BADASS
    yosup posted on Sep 30, 2010 7:01:29 AM - Report post
     
    I haven't seen a 3D movie since Spy Kids 3. I guess if I don't by the time Episode I comes to theaters, that will be my first non blue and red glasses 3D experience.
    /--\

    Keep your eyes in the clouds, your feet on the ground, and dance to the drums of your own song.
  • Current rank: 2.5 Stars. Next Rank at 2000 Posts.
    Send a message to Dhampy
    ELITE
    Dhampy posted on Sep 30, 2010 7:09:38 AM - Report post
     
    Stupid idea.

    When you convert a normal image into a stereoscopic image, it looks like ****.

    Plus the fact that every single human being already perceive three dimensions in two-dimensional images due to perspective and visual cues.

    But Lucas is all about the money. And ONLY about the money.
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, 'Make us your slaves, but feed us.'

    List of CHU'ers on deviantART--SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL DEVIANTS!

    /--\
    [SG]
  • Current rank: 3 Stars. Next Rank at 4000 Posts.
    Send a message to SuperSkyline89
    AUTHOR
    SuperSkyline89 posted on Sep 30, 2010 8:08:01 AM - Report post
     
    Avatar wasn't true 3D and that Piranha thing was the stupidest idea I've ever seen. So I'm not impressed by the 3D movies out lately.

    I think Star Wars in 3D would be cool. But first it has to be real 3D, not that 3 layers garbage in Avatar. And it has to be a completely re-filmed movie, you can't just take the original and make it 3D. That just screams money grab and nothing else.

    I'll still go see the first one though. Can't bash a movie like that if I've never seen it. And it may turn out to be decent. If there was ever a movie made to be watched in theater it's Star Wars, adding more effects would just make that more so, even if it turns out to be only half decent it'll still be a bit of fun.

    [Edited by SuperSkyline89, 9/30/2010 8:13:58 AM]
    I don't want a big car, particularly. I have no need for acreage, and I don't like the fuel bills. But I don't want a small one because they're all like supermarket own-brand cola: weedy imitations of the real thing - Jeremy Clarkson

    /--\ - Lance Corporal

    Petrol Heads - High Roller
  • Current rank: 3.5 Stars. Next Rank at 8000 Posts.
    Send a message to HonestGamer
    AUTHOR
    HonestGamer posted on Sep 30, 2010 10:23:02 AM - Report post
     
    Well my head pains and eyes get tired whenever I think of 3D Movies. Its better to stick with 2D.

    I concur with shianova that 3D Movies nowadays aren't fun to watch because they don't have that many effects where you get stuff coming at you...All you get is a headache.

    However if carefully made, Star Wars can suit the 3D environment...It has the caliber to become enjoyable since 3D effects suits most of the fights the movie has. What we can do is let some people go through it and ask then whether it was worth it or not.
    Life is best for those who enjoy it, difficult for those who analyze it and worst for those who criticize it.
  • Current rank: 1 Star. Next Rank at 100 Posts.
    Send a message to golem148
    ELITE
    golem148 posted on Sep 30, 2010 10:50:16 AM - Report post
     
    quote:
    originally posted by Dhampy

    Stupid idea.

    When you convert a normal image into a stereoscopic image, it looks like ****.

    Plus the fact that every single human being already perceive three dimensions in two-dimensional images due to perspective and visual cues.

    But Lucas is all about the money. And ONLY about the money.

    I don't find that correct.. yes, the human eye is receiving pictures in 3d. BUT if the screen is 2d. Then the eye will see the screen as 3d but what's in the screen will still be 2d

    Hi!
  • Current rank: 3 Stars. Next Rank at 4000 Posts.
    Send a message to AdmiralThrawn
    CRAHSYSTOR
    AdmiralThrawn posted on Sep 30, 2010 12:28:56 PM - Report post
     
    Star Wars in 3D.

    Kill me. Kill me now.
    /--\
    Keep Calm
    And
    Throw a blanket over it

    Ten minutes of entertainment, crammed into three hours.
  • Current rank: 2.5 Stars. Next Rank at 2000 Posts.
    Send a message to Dhampy
    ELITE
    Dhampy posted on Sep 30, 2010 1:05:33 PM - Report post
     
    quote:
    originally posted by golem148

    quote:
    originally posted by Dhampy

    Stupid idea.

    When you convert a normal image into a stereoscopic image, it looks like ****.

    Plus the fact that every single human being already perceive three dimensions in two-dimensional images due to perspective and visual cues.

    But Lucas is all about the money. And ONLY about the money.

    I don't find that correct.. yes, the human eye is receiving pictures in 3d. BUT if the screen is 2d. Then the eye will see the screen as 3d but what's in the screen will still be 2d

    Your eyes don't see in 3D. Your brain interprets depth in what you see.

    The same way your brain tells you that one object is closer than another in the real world--through various visual cues like foreshortening and perspective--makes you see three dimensions in a photograph, realistic painting or movie screen.

    You have never once in your entire life seen a two dimensional movie or TV show. This is a fact which cannot be disputed.

    Your brain has always perceived depth in the images.

    All that the stereoscopic process does is exaggerate the visual cues which already exist.

    And in the process, makes the image look like crap.

    Do an experiment. Close one eye. You still perceive depth, don't you? And you still perceive it in the exact same way. If your eye were in the center of your head, you wouldn't know the difference.

    [Edited by Dhampy, 9/30/2010 1:07:52 PM]

    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, 'Make us your slaves, but feed us.'

    List of CHU'ers on deviantART--SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL DEVIANTS!

    /--\
    [SG]
Page 1 of 2   •  First Page  •  Previous Page  •   Next Page  •   Last Page
Signup or Login to Post
All times are (GMT -06:00) Central Time (US & Canada). Current time is 10:12:42 PM