Stupid idea.
When you convert a normal image into a stereoscopic image, it looks like ****.
Plus the fact that every single human being already perceive three dimensions in two-dimensional images due to perspective and visual cues.
But Lucas is all about the money. And ONLY about the money.
I don't find that correct.. yes, the human eye is receiving pictures in 3d. BUT if the screen is 2d. Then the eye will see the screen as 3d but what's in the screen will still be 2d
Stupid idea.
When you convert a normal image into a stereoscopic image, it looks like ****.
Plus the fact that every single human being already perceive three dimensions in two-dimensional images due to perspective and visual cues.
But Lucas is all about the money. And ONLY about the money.
I don't find that correct.. yes, the human eye is receiving pictures in 3d. BUT if the screen is 2d. Then the eye will see the screen as 3d but what's in the screen will still be 2d
Your eyes don't see in 3D. Your brain interprets depth in what you see.
The same way your brain tells you that one object is closer than another in the real world--through various visual cues like foreshortening and perspective--makes you see three dimensions in a photograph, realistic painting or movie screen.
You have never once in your entire life seen a two dimensional movie or TV show. This is a fact which cannot be disputed.
Your brain has always perceived depth in the images.
All that the stereoscopic process does is exaggerate the visual cues which already exist.
And in the process, makes the image look like crap.
Do an experiment. Close one eye. You still perceive depth, don't you? And you still perceive it in the exact same way. If your eye were in the center of your head, you wouldn't know the difference.
[Edited by Dhampy, 9/30/2010 1:07:52 PM]